British workers Essay

Firstly, some say that evacuation wasn’t well organised, so when children arrived at their destination to be looked after, it was usually the cleaner and smarter children who where chosen first. This could have had an effect on the emotions of the children and they might of informed their parents, by knowing that they were unwanted. From Source A, we can see that children were excited about going to live in a new area for several months, as they might of thought they were going on holiday. But, just because they seemed happy, the parents might not of been, and instead, be worried for the lives of their children. This is a reliable Source, as it is a picture taken on the day children were walking to London station. Source B shows an interview with a teacher that took place in 1988. We can see that from the teacher’s experience, evacuation was just as upsetting for her as it was for the mothers of the children. This Source also shows us that evacuation was rather unorganised, as the teachers didn’t know where they were going and the children might have been nervous and worried. Again, this is quite a reliable Source, because it is from a teachers experience during evacuation. Next, Source C shows an extract from a children’s novel. From this Source, we can see that if children were poor, unlike Carrie and Nick, the foster parents would think that their shoes would have been dirty so they would have to â€Å"keep to the middle of the stair carpet. † However, these children might have felt it was a joke, as they weren’t poor. This just goes to show how unorganised the evacuation progress was. This Source may not be as reliable as the previous two Sources, as it may be biased and is from a fictional, 1973 novel. The next Source is a wartime propaganda poster aimed at Scottish people, persuading them to foster evacuee children. We can see from this Source that the British Government need new foster parents, should the unexpected happen. I also think this poster was used to possibly boost morale, so parents could see that their children were most likely to be safe and happy. The next reason is that it is obvious that evacuation saved the lives of thousands of evacuees. The Government knew that evacuation was a good idea because of this, but the parents of the children didn’t think the children were safe by sending them somewhere they didn’t know about. Parents thought that their children would be safer with them, or with their friends and family, as we can see in Source E. From the Source seen in Hope and Glory, we can see that the mother feels so upset about letting go of her children, she regrets it, and thinks it is best if they stay with here, even though they can’t. This shows how hard it was for parents to let go of their children during the evacuation progress, as they didn’t know what would happen to them. In conclusion, I would say that evacuation was a great success. Children were taken from busy or poor living standards and put into safer, quieter countryside locations. Most children that were evacuated had better living conditions where they where staying, for example, they had plenty of food all of the time, most of them had their own room and accessories (such as their own toothbrushes, soap and flannel), and they were happy by living in such good standards. Also, evacuation was a success because it gave British workers more time to worry about the war, instead of the lives of their children.